|
|
Post by cealdor on Oct 18, 2010 22:11:07 GMT
Razor really only works with client version 2.0.x.. Although UoAssist works with the current client being used. I've got Uoassist with key laying around on my extern harddrive  |
|
|
|
Post by orbital on Oct 18, 2010 22:16:54 GMT
beh, ima give up on razor - found a macro program that does everything i need.
although in the future i may want it as i remember UOassist was clutch in pvp...
|
|
|
|
Post by payne on Oct 19, 2010 20:43:14 GMT
Only if youre a bad <3
|
|
|
|
Post by orbital on Oct 19, 2010 23:52:07 GMT
bad <3, what does that mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by payne on Oct 20, 2010 16:08:39 GMT
That UOassasst is Clutch in pvp if you are bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by orbital on Oct 20, 2010 20:04:25 GMT
Oh right, understand. I never used UOassist in OSI but that was ancient times..
|
|
enfo
Newbie
Posts: 3 
|
Post by enfo on Oct 21, 2010 23:00:20 GMT
I could not get the old version of razor to work on my desktop ( Win 7 ultimate ) but, by downgrading the framework from 4 to 1 on my EEE pc I got it to work. I also noticed when I have 2 copies of razor that one will corrupt the other and that the old tries to access the new versions xml and such. Ill test around and see if I can make some editations, but im sure that microsoft framework net of 3+ will more than likely be an issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by orbital on Oct 24, 2010 10:43:23 GMT
hmmm will try this week
|
|
|
|
Post by charsi on Nov 3, 2010 6:10:16 GMT
Egh.. that sucks.
I can't imagine playing again with Razor for macroing. Nice and non-intrusive, does exactly what I need it to do. What a shame =/
|
|
|
|
Post by lopa on Nov 3, 2010 7:01:50 GMT
Directly copied from runUO/Razor forum.
Q:"Razor work with client 1.26.4a ?"
A: From Zippy the creator and core developer of Razor
"No. And it never will."
|
|
|
|
Post by orbital on Nov 3, 2010 7:21:19 GMT
UOloop and Quick macro ..
|
|
|
|
Post by mastasook on Nov 19, 2010 15:29:01 GMT
what about uo gateway, saw only one account per ip, I dont see anything wrong with dual client. unless i missed a post about it but i was catching up on a lot sround here and i bet the dual client would be very beneficial to everyone
|
|
|
|
Post by mastasook on Nov 19, 2010 15:48:09 GMT
well u can set up yoko injection with that exact same client but i have no idea how to use nor do i wanna try to use yoko injection
|
|
|
|
Post by mastasook on Nov 19, 2010 15:59:32 GMT
actually i love uoautopiliot
|
|
|
|
Post by Prometheus on Nov 19, 2010 16:00:05 GMT
what about uo gateway, saw only one account per ip, I dont see anything wrong with dual client. unless i missed a post about it but i was catching up on a lot sround here and i bet the dual client would be very beneficial to everyone What I'm trying to achieve, with no dual clienting, is something like what most people experienced back on ZH1/2 - only playing on one character at a time. Back then the class system wasn't around, so there was no reason to dual client or start other characters, you just raised crafting on your PP. By making a rule to stick with only one client, I'm trying to reintroduce that feeling of genuinely caring about your character, and identifying with it. We reminisce about Roadie, Vulcan, Yukmouth, Sir Ice, Evin Razid or whoever because that's who they were, if that makes sense. It doesn't seem as realistic if we're talking about multiple characters and one player. I think caring about your character is really important in a mmorpg, and keeps players playing, keeps the sense of achievement or failure more real. It's one of the key things I think are important in gameplay. |
|
